|
During the colonial days and for some years after independence,
people going abroad for further studies and duty were first
given training in etiquette, so that they did not embarrass
the country.
They used to undergo residential training at the Uganda Social
Training Institute then at Nsamizi in Entebbe.
The curriculum then must have included things like identifying
the correct wine glass at dinner, saying ‘please’
and ‘thank you’ which don’t come easily
in some of our languages and some ballroom dancing steps.
Such training is no longer necessary because the number
of people going abroad is staggering and is mostly privately
arranged; our people are now already exposed before they leave
the country as many of them live in modern homes, go to school,
watch TV and already encounter modern public facilities in
Kampala.
But the country today is getting terribly bad publicity from
the very people who are supposed to promote its image - its
diplomats. World over, the only crime a diplomat is expected
to be accused of is ‘conducting oneself in a manner
incompatible with diplomatic status…”, which is
official parlance for spying.
When a diplomat is expelled for spying, it is understandable
that he was conducting the illegal activity on behalf of his
country. It may be illegal but not entirely dishonourable,
after all, even the most friendly countries gather intelligence
on their allies. Sometimes, they even pass on the findings
to the very country they have spied on.
In Uganda’s case, you rarely hear of a diplomat being
accused of spying. Instead, you hear of sex assault, overstaying
a student visa or smuggling narcotics. Now dealing drugs is
a very serious offence which in some countries fetches the
death sentence. So cheap diplomats who are trafficking heroin
are lucky not to be caught in Singapore.
But where did such crude people emerge from to start manning
our diplomatic services, which are expected to be the hallmark
of superb self conduct? Aren’t diplomats supposed to
be the most refined people on earth?
One problem seems to be lack of merit in securing the postings.
If someone has not gone through the proper recruitment channels
followed by proper training, they are bound to mess up on
being posted. So whoever is responsible for hiring diplomats
should teach them what is permissible, even if it means reopening
Nsamizi training institute.
The bottom line should be that nobody is conscripted into
diplomatic service. If you cannot manage with the official
salary and allowances, do not take the job.
-Monitor, July 13, 2006 -
|